Contingency: Pre adoption 1. Trial and Pilot 2. Flexibility 3. Client Needs 4. Institutional Perceptions 5. Success vs. They are very constructive, even though, with Department of Transportation officials indoctrinated in McNamarian cost advantage analysis. All Ford had to do was persuade men like John Volpe, Claude Brinegar and William Coleman successive Secretaries of Transportation during case study solution Nixon Ford years that sure safety standards would add an awful lot to case study answer price of cars that fewer people would buy them. This could damage case study solution auto industry, which was still believed to be case study solution bulwark of case study answer American financial system. Compliance to those standards, Henry Ford II prophesied at more than one press convention, will shut down case study solution industry. The Nixon Transportation Secretaries were case study solution type of regulatory officials big business dreams of. They understood and loved capitalism and idea like businessmen. It comes to be be more dangerous when case study answer land is likely to have seismic activities. In order to make hydropwer risk issues more tangible, pay heed to an example. Sayano shushenskaya dam is case study answer world’s six biggest hyropower plant that’s observed in Russia. It has had four accidents in 1979, 1985 1988 and 2009 respectively. In case study solution last coincidence 75 were confirmed dead. In universal, hydropower is safe than fossil fuel approaches and nuclear system as there are no site emissions of green house gases, nowaste and no thermal degradation of water.